|
by
Konstantin Monastyrsky
I bet you don't want to get fat or drop dead from diabetes
or heart disease. At least until the next meal, that is...
Unfortunately, that's the nature of the “beast” — we are programmed by
nature to eat, eat, and eat in order to hoard nutrients and energy all
over the body.
And that's what our ancestors did throughout history —
they ate, ate, and ate while foods were plentiful, and fasted or
semi-fasted while foods were scarce. So, here is today's dilemma — foods
never become scarce, and plentiful foods are killing us. What to do?
Go back to basics!
There are three possible hopes for attaining health and,
by extension,
longevity — wishful thinking, medical intervention, and basic
nutrition.
1. The wishful thinking
paradigm states that immortality is just around the corner — genome
projects, stem cells, reprogramming of the telomeres, cryogenics, the
works. Go baby, go! Eat yourself to death, but we‘ll take care of you
real soon. Right? The tombstones of the hopefuls— rich and poor alike—
who died from a “healthy diet” wouldn‘t fit into the Arlington Cemetery.
2. The medical
intervention paradigm is best represented by the “lifestyle” drugs.
High sugar from too much carbs? No problem, just take Avandia?.
Hypertension from Avandia? No problem, just take Diovan?. Congestive
heart failure from Diovan? No problem, just take thiazide (a diuretic).
It works, kind of? Live in misery a bit longer — yes. Health and
longevity — forget it!
3. The basic nutrition
paradigm is the most difficult to grasp because it‘s cheap, simple,
low-tech, and doesn‘t require anything special to do — except reading,
thinking, and follow through. And, so far, it‘s the only one proven to
work. I hope you‘ll adopt it, because it‘s the foundation of health and
longevity.
Since there are no money-making opportunities and no
glamour attached to anything “basic,” you are least likely to hear about
basic nutrition from the promoters, whose livelihoods, tenures, and
self-aggrandizement depends on the “next best thing.”
To make basic nutrition palatable — sorry, promotable —
I too gave it a glamorous name: 'Ageless Nutrition.' If immortality is
indeed around the corner, at the very least you‘ll get there in better
shape. Imagine the indignity of facing eternal life while feeling and
looking like a beat-up old bag?
To assure you that this isn‘t yet another exercise in
wishful thinking, here is a detailed primer on basic nutrition, referred
to throughout this essay either as the utilitarian longevity diet or
the idealistic ageless nutrition approach.
Nutrition to thrive vs. nutrition to get by
We — the rich and pampered Westerners — eat primarily
for fun. Our ancestors ate for survival. Until quite recently, fun with
food wasn‘t yet an option for anyone but kings, queens, and their
coterie. Everyone else thrived on basic nutrition — strictly foods from
nature and without excess.
Once you pattern this kind of basic nutrition
into your lifestyle, you are practically guaranteed longevity thanks to
today‘s extra safety net from the state-of-the-art emergency and
infectious diseases medicine. On top of that, the modernity and
technology largely offset the newer risk factors, such as pollution,
depleted soils, prior exposure to drugs, and so on.
With minor exceptions, the core ingredients of basic
nutrition remain unchanged from the beginning of the Neolithic era
about 8,000 to 10,000 years ago until the commencement of the
Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century, when specialization, sophistication, and food processing radically altered
urban lifestyles and diets.
Just before the Industrial Revolution, our ancestors
could count their food choices on ten fingers. With a menu
that limited, there was no need for nutritionists — all of the wholesome
“goodies” literally fell into their lap by the evolutionary fiat in the
form of basic nutrition.
The popular notion that before modern medicine and
nutrition, people hadn‘t been healthy or lived long, is a smoke screen.
Poor, destitute, and hard laborers indeed hadn‘t lived very long then,
nor are they living any longer today. The upper strata, however, enjoyed
good health and longevity. Here are the actuary stats for the American
presidents born prior to the 20th century, and who passed away from
natural causes:
|
President |
Date
of
birth |
Date
of
death |
Age |
|
James Polk |
1795 |
1849 |
54 |
|
Chester A. Arthur |
1829 |
1886 |
57 |
|
Warren Harding |
1865 |
1923 |
58 |
|
Calvin Coolidge |
1872 |
1933 |
61 |
|
Ulysses S. Grant |
1822 |
1885 |
63 |
|
Franklin D. Roosevelt |
1882 |
1945 |
63 |
|
Franklin Pierce |
1804 |
1868 |
64 |
|
Zachary Taylor |
1784 |
1850 |
66 |
|
George Washington |
1732 |
1799 |
67 |
|
Andrew Johnson |
1808 |
1875 |
67 |
|
Benjamin Harrison |
1833 |
1901 |
68 |
|
Woodrow Wilson |
1856 |
1924 |
68 |
|
William Henry Harrison |
1772 |
1841 |
69 |
|
Grover Cleveland |
1837 |
1907 |
70 |
|
Rutherford B. Hayes |
1822 |
1893 |
71 |
|
John Tyler |
1790 |
1862 |
72 |
|
Dwight D. Eisenhower |
1890 |
1962 |
72 |
|
James Monroe |
1758 |
1831 |
73 |
|
William H. Taft |
1857 |
1930 |
73 |
|
Millard Fillmore |
1800 |
1874 |
74 |
|
Andrew Jackson |
1767 |
1845 |
78 |
|
James Buchanan |
1791 |
1869 |
78 |
|
Martin Van Buren |
1782 |
1862 |
80 |
|
John Quincy Adams |
1767 |
1848 |
81 |
|
Thomas Jefferson |
1743 |
1826 |
83 |
|
James Madison |
1751 |
1836 |
85 |
|
Harry S. Truman |
1884 |
1972 |
88 |
|
Herbert Hoover |
1874 |
1964 |
90 |
|
John Adams |
1735 |
1826 |
91 |
|
Average age at death |
|
|
71.8 |
As you can see, the presidents born the earliest (in
the 18th century) lived the longest because they didn‘t live like
kings yet. The exceptions were Harry Truman and Herbert Hoover — the
luckiest of the bunch — both born late enough to still enjoy basic
nutrition, while managing to catch most of the modern comforts and
conveniences.
Remarkable, isn‘t it? Our presidents born in the 18th
and 19th centuries enjoyed a 71.8-year average life span, just 3 years shy
of the life expectancy for American men living in the 21st century.
It‘s even more remarkable when considering that most of
these gentlemen had lived and worked in or around malaria-infested
Washington, shook a great deal of dirty hands, commuted in horse-drawn
carriages, drank wines, smoked cigars, or chewed tobacco as was common
during that era. John Adams began smoking a pipe at age 8, and lived to
be 91. James Madison smoked until his death at 85 [link].
I am not, of course, condoning smoking, snuff, or drinking,
but
making a point about the protective properties of basic nutrition.
With today‘s environment and pollution, you need every bit of extra
protection you can get.
Was it better luck, stronger genes, smarter doctors, or
safer drugs that enabled them to live that long. No, no, no, and no — it
was all related to their basic nutrition. It goes without saying
that none of them took drugs or supplements — at that time they simply didn't have any.
Wishful thinking, false hopes, and a sustenance diet in
the second half of the 20th century have left deadly imprints on the
health of our recent presidents and vice presidents, who, plus or minus
few years, are our contemporaries — and certainly enjoy a king‘s
lifestyle.
The former president Bill
Clinton (born 1946) barely survived a massive heart attack at 58,
despite his fling with the South Beach Diet and extensive exercising with
a private trainer.
Despite his gilded
lifestyle before, during, and after the vice-presidency, Al Gore
(born 1948) is affected by metabolic syndrome, which is apparent
from his substantial truncal obesity.
President George Bush (born
1946) had hemorrhoids in his youth, precancerous polyps in his colon in 1998 and
1999, cancerous lesions on his skin, a syncope episode most likely
related to hypoglycemia, osteoarthritis in his knees, and attention
deficit disorder/hyperactivity disorder, apparent from his dyslexia.
Vice President Dick Cheney
(born 1941) experienced his first heart attack at age 37, and his
heart has been propped up with an implanted cardiac defibrillator
since 2001. His list of chronic conditions is so long, the ambulance
and cardiac resuscitation team follows him wherever he goes.
The basic nutrition of the 20th century hasn‘t been
very generous health-wise — not just to presidents, but to the rest of
Americans as well. By the late 1930s, or early 1940s, the scientists
knew (more or less) what was missing from the contemporary diet, and attempted to fix it. The first Recommended Dietary Allowances were
released in 1941. Since then the RDAs have been hotly debated, and
updated 11 times.
Recognizing that the situation isn‘t getting any
better, the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences
abandoned RDAs in 1998, and has begun releasing Dietary Reference
Intakes (DRI) recommendations
[link].
But the basic tenets of DRI remained the same as RDA, and the debate
over the best sources for these nutrients is still far from settled.
On the DRI side, there are
the advocates of the Food Guide Pyramid (MyPyramid.gov) who believe
you should get all of your nutrients from fresh fruits, vegetables,
and processed foods (fortified bread, cereals, juices, and fat-free
or low-fat
dairy) just as in this illustration (modified to fit this screen,
click the picture to see the original):

On the basic nutrition
side are those who realize that you can‘t get all of the required
macro- and micro-nutrients from food unless you lead an al fresco
lifestyle in an unspoiled natural environment identical to that of
our ancestors or of people still living in well-known longevity
zones, as I described in the Fiber-Related Malnutrition
essay.
As you can imagine, I clearly represent the basic
nutrition side. My position is based on comparing foods people eat
in the known longevity zones (longevity diet) vis-?vis the Food
Guide Pyramid (sustenance diet).
If you know what to look for, it doesn‘t take a Ph.D.
in nutrition to spot the differences between these two diets, just
common sense — a classic approach from the forensic nutrition's prospective.
Once you recognize the difference, there are two ways to
attain health and longevity. The first one is to continue testing your
luck with the Food Guide Pyramid just like our presidents and vice
presidents were/are doing all along. The second way, which I propose, is to
adapt your eating as close as possible to basic nutrition—proven
to “deliver the goods” by the ordinary lives of still-living
centenarians in known longevity regions.
The second choice becomes even more transparent when
presented this way: If you were a newborn, and had a choice between
mother‘s milk and infant formula, which one would you chose? Which one
would be more nutritious and healthier for you?
Even a newborn is smart enough to answer these
questions without giving it a second thought:
|
If you can help it, stay away from the “formula!” |
Here is the analysis of basic nutrition
vis-?vis the Food Guide Pyramid. If this helps you in “getting off
the formula,” then health and longevity are just around the corner.
The key ingredients of basic nutrition
Basic nutrition is far from ascetic — it‘s food from
nature, not little food. And it isn‘t bland — it‘s food from nature, not
tasteless food. And it isn‘t boring — it‘s food from nature, not just all the
same food all of the time. And it isn‘t puritanical — spirits from nature are okay too.
As you can see, the key operating words are “food from nature.”
Here are the core ingredients of basic nutrition.
This is people‘s nutrition in known longevity zones:
Extended and exclusive
breastfeeding. Until the widespread availability of reliable
formulas in 1950-60's, most children were breastfed exclusively
until the development of deciduous (milk) teeth, and, depending on
lactation strength, well past that point. Children were strong, sturdy, and
disease-resistant.
Unprocessed natural
water with a high mineral salt content. Until the widespread
availability of tap water, which is heavily processed (i.e.
filtered, aerated, ionized, and treated with chemical
disinfectants), people were drinking mainly well or spring water,
which is naturally rich in mineral salts. This kind of water
provided all essential minerals and trace elements throughout life,
particularly calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, and iodine. These
minerals are essential for normal heart function, bone strength,
collagen production, and blood oxygenation (iron) and thyroid health
(iodine). Soft tap water lacks them all, and today‘s industrial food
can‘t replenish them either.
No overhydration.
Because there was no refrigeration or proper storage, fresh water
was consumed mainly at the source to prevent digestive infections.
The rest of the water was obtained mainly from food, fermented
dairy, and low-alcohol beverages. This prevented overhydration and
loss of essential minerals with urine.
Natural meat from small
grazing animals. Fresh dairy, organ meats, and
the minimally-processed meat of grazing animals provided many of the
essential vitamins, minerals, and microelements. Today‘s meats from
corn-fed livestock have negligible amounts of essential supplements,
and high-temperature cooking reduces their availability even more.
Consumption of organ
meats and fermented dairy from free-range, grazing animals.
Organ meat, particularly liver, offers the highest concentration of
minerals, trace elements, and vitamins (particularly the B-group). Organ
meats also provided plentiful vitamin B-12, which is essential for
health, but not available from any plant sources. Today organ meat
is rarely consumed.
Naturally-fermented
dairy provided abundant predigested proteins, high-quality fat,
and easily-assimilated minerals. These kinds of products are no
longer broadly consumed.
Year-round exposure to
UV-rays. Historically, most vitamin D was synthesized from
cholesterol in the skin receptors under the influence of the sun‘s
UV-rays.
No exposure to
antibiotics and antibacterial drugs. Intestinal flora is known
to produce biotin (essential B-vitamin) and vitamin K. People in
rural longevity zones had never used antibiotics and antibacterial
drugs, such as mercury. They didn‘t depend on these vitamins to come
from dietary sources.
Consumption of fatty
fish provides a continuous supply of essential fatty acids (EPA
and DHA), as well as vitamins A & D. Most of the farm-raised fish,
fillets, and warm-water fish lack similar quality fat and vitamins,
even if regularly consumed.
Cooking techniques.
People in longevity zones consume most food as soon as they are
harvested, raw, or use low-temperature cooking methods. These
factors preserve most of the micronutrients in these foods.
Natural ratio of
macronutrients. Free-range meats are fairly lean, because
grasses aren‘t as energy-dense as corn or wheat. The ratio of
protein to fat in raw lamb‘s quarters, for example, is 4.25 to 1,
and slightly less fat after broiling and draining it. Wild-caught
fish and seafood, particularly from warm waters, are also lean.
Carbohydrate consumption was low and sporadic, particularly as one
moved away from the tropics. That‘s because until very recently,
there were no means to store, mill, and process grains into
year-round consumables, and fresh fruits and vegetables were
available only seasonally.
Negligible dietary
fiber. Fiber in food was always avoided, and still is outside of
English-speaking countries. Until recently there was no means of
processing insoluble fiber into edible food. The minor amounts of
soluble fiber consumed with natural fruits and vegetables don‘t
impact health.
Liberal consumption of
low-alcohol wines and ales. Wines and ales were a primary source
of water and carbohydrates. They were easy to make, energy-dense,
and offered a reliable source of hydration without risk of
contamination, particularly for people who didn‘t lived close to
natural springs or dug wells. The natural acidity, low sugar
content, and presence of ethanol preserved wines and neutralized
pathogens. Also, these beverages contain minerals, microelements,
and phytochemicals — plant substances known for their antioxidant
and anti-inflammatory effects. Natural grape wines also offered “nutritionally
significant levels of riboflavin, vitamin B6 and niacin
[
link].”
This kind of basic nutrition, adapted to today‘s
realities and environment, becomes the longevity diet, and
provides a viable alternative to the sustenance diet, described next.
The sustenance diet — it gets you by until bye-bye?
It‘s quite ironic that our emblem of healthy nutrition
is called the Pyramid Food Guide, considering that the pyramids were the
tombstones for dead pharaohs — and that fraudulent schemes based on the
complicity of many participants are called “pyramids” too.

This “healthy nutrition” is
carbohydrate-heavy because grains, fruits, vegetables, and processed
dairy are cheap and plentiful, while meats and fish are expensive. The
original RDAs were formulated for people in prisons, orphanages, and on
public assistance, hence the reliance on cheap food.
The problems with today‘s pyramid (as both — a
tombstone and a deception) are obvious, once you begin comparing “what was
before”
with “what is now.” Here are all the same ingredients of the sustenance
diet, but this time “what is now:”
Breastfeeding is limited
or absent. Few children receive exclusive breastfeeding past 6
months of age. Up to 75% are fed formula [link].
Very few children receive extended breastfeeding. Asthma, anemia,
bone disease, cavities, depression, diabetes, obesity, deformed
jaws, chronic colds, and digestive disorders are widespread among
children. For most, antibiotics replaced innate immunity.
Devitalized tap water.
Raw unprocessed water isn‘t available to most, unless you have
your own dug or artesian well, and don‘t filter and soften ground
water. Surface water (i.e. from rainfall, rivers, lakes) doesn‘t
offer the same mineral content as raw water. Tap water is behind
arthritis, osteoporosis, tooth loss, cardiovascular disorders
(calcium and magnesium deficiency), thyroid dysfunctions (iodine),
gray hair, wrinkles, and atherosclerosis (copper), diabetes
(chromium), and many other conditions.
Overhydration.
Excessive consumption of water causes rapid depletion of minerals
stored in bones. The more demineralized water you drink, the more
minerals are required to maintain blood homeostasis. Some of these
minerals leave the body with urine and stools, but don‘t get
promptly replaced, because tap water doesn‘t contain any.
Consequently, most Americans experience bone disease and tooth
loss long before reaching the midlife point. Healthy people in known
longevity zones rarely experience tooth decay or tooth loss, and
don‘t suffer from osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. The perils of overhydration extend well past bone disease, as described in detail
in the second chapter of Fiber Menace — called Water
Damage.
Devitalized food.
The majority of foods produced by agro-industrial complexes use
every conceivable technology to “optimize yield” — synthetic
fertilizers, toxic herbicides and pesticides, genetically-modified
planting material, and so on. Practically all plants are grown on
overused soil, devoid of essential minerals and trace elements.
Fruits and vegetables are collected before maturity to preserve
appearance, and stored in conditions that cause oxidation and loss
of vitamins. The quality of meat, fowl, and fish is low because of
industrial growing techniques, while their contamination with
antibiotics and growth hormones is high. Practically all dairy, even
some organic, is made from dry milk mixed with tap water. Fat is
removed to be sold at a substantial premium as heavy cream, sour
cream, and butter.
No daylight exposure.
Minimal daylight exposure and the widespread use of sunblocks causes
profound vitamin D deficiency in most of the population. Rickets,
scoliosis, and osteomalacia (all bone-softening diseases) has become equally
widespread and common.
Compromised or absent
intestinal flora. Endogenous (in situ) biosynthesis of biotin
and vitamin K by bacteria has been compromised in the population
from the widespread use of antibiotics and antibacterial drugs, as well
as by common pollutants, heavy metals, pesticides, and herbicides.
This has lead to a broad number of neurological, skin, and mucosal
disorders, hard-to-stop bleeding, and many other ailments.
Chronic deficiency of
essential fatty acids. Wild-caught raw fatty fish is an
expensive rarity for most of the population. High-temperature
cooking destroys perishable essential fatty acids. On top of that,
fat is scorned, and most fish is consumed as fillets stripped of
fat. This leads to developmental problems, depression, bone disease,
blood disorders, heart disease, and many other problems.
Intensive food
processing. Gas and electric stoves, ovens, and microwaves allow
for extended high-temperature cooking, substantial denaturation of
proteins, rendering of fats, and destruction of delicate essential
fatty acids. Even when foods are consumed that have seemingly
adequate amounts of necessary nutrients, intensive cooking may cause
malnutrition.
Overconsumption of
certain nutrients. Vegetables fats and carbohydrates are
routinely overconsumed in contemporary diets. This imbalance is
behind the widespread occurrence of metabolic syndrome (prediabetes), obesity, and degenerative
diseases.
Excessive consumption
and dependence of dietary fiber. The consequences of fiber
overconsumption are the focus of this site and Fiber Menace.
Digestive disorders caused by fiber render an already meager diet
even more deficient.
Overuse of distilled
spirits. Distillation and aging of fermented fruits and grains
into distilled high-proof spirits wasn‘t generally available until
the 15-16th century, and widespread consumption didn‘t begin
until a more evolved market economy. High-proof distilled drinks
have zero nutritional value (relative to young wines), cause rapid
dehydration, loss of minerals with excessive urination, liver
disease, and dependence. Inadequate distillation leaves behind
alcohols other than ethanol that are extremely toxic.
Widespread malnutrition isn‘t big news to the United
States government, which ends up funding Medicaid and Medicare insurance
programs from our tax dollars. For this reason the government demands
mandatory fortification of wheat flour and rice with folic acid, niacin,
and iron; dairy with vitamin A, and recommends fortification of juices
with vitamins C, D, and calcium, and dairy with vitamin D.
Alas, it‘s too little, and too late. We get to live as
we eat? According to the USDA, Americans spent $899.8 billion for food
in 2006 [link].
Since we are spending twice as much on healthcare as Japan (which mainly
has retained traditional ways of eating), an extra trillion dollars is
spent to take care of nutritional disorders [link].
In essence, the United States government could have provided every
single citizen with free food for less money than we are spending to
support a sustenance diet.
So it‘s a no-brainer — basic nutrition is better
than a sustenance diet. You don‘t get sick for nothing, and you get to
live a longer life. But how do you switch to one without moving to
Sardinia or Okinawa?
The longevity diet
Now I‘ll take all the same bullets as in the prior two
sections, and will reinterpret basic nutrition according
to today‘s realities. I recognize that complex diets don‘t work. What‘s
great about the longevity diet is that it isn‘t so much about
what to eat, but about what not to eat. Here are the key ingredients of
the longevity diet and the reasons why it should be selected:
Extended and exclusive
breastfeeding. If you are contemplating having babies, prepare
yourself for breastfeeding far in advance. Lactation requires
minerals, trace elements, and vitamins to produce quality milk for
your baby, but without depleting your body stores. Otherwise your
bones will become soft, your skin saggy, your mood depressed, your
gums receded, and your baby — unhappy and malnourished from poor
quality milk. None of these conditions affect people in the
longevity zones, who breastfeed numerous children without any
apparent damage.
High-mineral content
water. Unless you can drill an artesian well in your backyard
and consume well water without softening and filtering, your chances
of consuming quality cooking and drinking water are nil. At the very
least, drink quality mineral water, and take high-grade supplements
to compensate for calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, iodine, and
other trace elements missing from your local water tap.
Avoid overhydration.
Your total daily requirements for water in normal conditions is
under 2 liters — including all water from food and drinks, and water
produced in the body by metabolic oxidation (about 350 ml). If you
maintain basic nutrition, you may need at best two to four
glasses of water extra throughout the day. Avoid all canned drinks,
because they contain diuretic additives (caffeine, sugar, acids)
that deprive you from water already consumed. I recognize that this
is a controversial subject, and don‘t wish to oversimplify it.
Consider reading Fiber Menace for more details. You‘ll be
amazed how much better you‘ll feel once you stop overhydration —
better sleep, more energy, stable blood pressure, no constant thirst
(yes, excess drinking dehydrates you), and no running to the
bathroom almost every hour. This is particularly liberating while
commuting, attending games, movies, plays, etc.
Frequency of nutrition.
In Fiber Menace I recommend eating Japanese-style — several
light dishes in the morning and afternoon, and one major meal at the
end of the day. Please note that children and young adults may eat
more often and more in general, because their digestion is directed
toward growth, and is several times more efficient than that of a
healthy adult at ages 40-50.
Natural meat from small
grazing animals. This is, actually, easy to accomplish.
Australian, New Zealand, and Icelandic lamb is plentiful in
supermarkets and specialty stores. All of it is free-range, tasty,
and affordable.
Consumption of organ
meats from free-range grazing animals. This is a tough one — most
people no longer like to cook or eat organ meat, such as liver,
because of the sharp taste. Because the demand is low, most of it
goes into pet food manufacturing, and it‘s often hard to procure,
particularly organic. If you aren‘t into eating liver often, take
high-grade supplements to obtain your daily requirements for vitamin
A, vitamin B-12, folate, niacin, choline, riboflavin, iron, copper,
selenium, and zinc — these are the vitamins and supplements that are
abundant in liver.
Fowl. All kind of
organic fowl — chicken, duck, geese, turkey — are good sources of
protein. Organic fowl is reasonably priced as well. Keep in mind
that “white meat” unlike “red meat” isn‘t a good source of dietary
iron and vitamin B-12, so you need to augment a fowl diet with
supplements.
Eggs. After the Food
Guide Pyramid put eggs back on the list of recommended products,
organic eggs have been in short supply nationwide. The yolk is the
most valuable part of an egg. Hard-boiled yolk (fried in omelets) is
nutritionally useless. So make sure to eat yours intact. Organic
eggs are best to avoid the risk of salmonella contamination.
Beef and pork. Beef
isn‘t a big part of basic nutrition, but it‘s acceptable as
long as it‘s free-range. Natural beef cuts and ground beef are okay
too, because the meat is lean and nutrient-dense. Pork is the main
staple of the Okinawan longevity diet. If you can procure organic
pork and like the taste, it‘s fine too.
Fermented dairy from
free-range animals. Whole milk isn‘t suitable for adults because
of lactose and casein allergies, and hard-to-digest minerals. Once
the milk is naturally fermented, lactose is gone, casein is
predigested into basic amino acids, and mineral bonds are broken
down. Also, dairy is chock full of calcium, magnesium, and
potassium. If you can‘t procure quality free-range milk, preferably
raw, and can‘t make your own fermented dairy, take supplements
instead.
Year-round exposure to
UV-rays. Unless you live in the Southern regions and have plenty of
time on your hands to catch the afternoon sun without wearing sunblock, and don‘t mind looking a little weathered eventually, then
obtaining enough vitamin D from the “blue sky” isn‘t an option. In
this case, take high-grade supplements or liquid cod liver oil.
Natural dairy isn‘t particularly high in vitamin D.
No exposure to
antibiotics and antibacterial drugs. If you ever took
antibiotics or some other antibacterial drugs, or were exposed to
heavy metals such as silver, mercury, aluminum, lead, and others,
your intestinal flora is no longer producing adequate amounts of
vitamin K and biotin. You should by all means restore intestinal
flora as described here, although it isn‘t clear to what extent it
will be able to replicate the “real thing. To assure adequate intake
of biotin and vitamin K, take high-grade supplements.
Consumption of fatty
fish. If you like fish, fatty fish from the northern waters is best
— preferably raw (sashimi) or lightly cooked, because intense
cooking destroys essential fatty acids. Keep in mind that fillets
are the least fatty cuts — most of the fat is always located under
the skin. So buy, cook, order, and eat your fish whole. If you don‘t
like fish, can‘t afford it often, or it isn‘t available, take a
teaspoon or two of liquid cod liver oil daily.
Cooking techniques.
This subject is beyond the scope of this essay. It goes without
saying that raw is always more nutritious than rare, rare more than
medium, medium more than well-done, and well-done, for the most
part, is nutritionally useless. That said, foods, particularly from
the supermarket, should be cooked well and to the indicated
temperature — the immediate risk of food poisoning may exceed the
risk of longer-term nutrient deficiency. This is where supplements
become useful again — cook safely, eat risk-free, and compensate for
missing nutrients with supplements to prevent malnutrition.
Lower requirement for
nutrients. If you consume quality food, as suggested above, you
already need less nutrients, because quality foods are more
nutrient-dense. All other suggestions, such as sleeping more and
working less, may sound great. But they aren‘t really constructive
or helpful, particularly for adults well set in their ways. If you
“work and play” harder, just take high-grade supplements to
compensate for your inevitable losses and existing damage.
Negligible dietary
fiber. It goes without saying that the longevity diet is low in
fiber, and contains no fiber from processed foods. If you can‘t
overcome constipation on a low-fiber diet because of a prior history
of colorectal disorders, just follow all of the related guides on
the parent page.
Moderate consumption of
salt. Salt was always prized as one of the most valuable foods.
The Roman centurions were paid salārium, or salt money (either in
salt or money to buy salt). The table salt in the American diet is
the sole source of iodine, a trace element essential for thyroid
health. Salt is also the sole source of
chloride in the diet. It‘s essential to produce hydrochloric acid to
digest protein. Low-salt diets cause indigestion, delayed digestion,
heartburn, GERD, peptic ulcers, and intestinal inflammatory
disorders down the digestive tract from the rotting of undigested
proteins. The longevity diet is naturally low in salt because it
excludes all processed food.
Make sure to consume at least 5 to 6 grams of salt daily (“Food and
Nutrition Board committee recently recommended that daily intake of
sodium chloride be limited to 6 g. (2.4 g of sodium) or less.” Water
and Electrolytes, page 253, Recommended Daily Allowances, 10th
edition, National Research Council.) These 1989 recommendations were
halved recently using fraudulent justification. I‘ll devote a
separate essay to this subject soon.
If this “revelation” still bothers you, consider this — practically
all ER patients are hooked up to an intravenous pump/drip as soon as
they are admitted. What‘s an I.V. fluid? It‘s 0.9% solution of table
salt. Hence, 5-6 grams of salt consumed daily represents 0.16% from
total blood volume, and only 0.014% from all body fluids, which
maintain similar “salinity.” So get over it, and do what the doctors
do to stabilize the critically sick — consume salt in moderation. It
will do your body good.
Moderate consumption of
wine. Table wines from France, Italy, and/or organic wines from other
regions/countries are the only ones suitable for drinking because
they contain no added sulfites, and are made from grapes grown in
organic conditions. Aged wines are loaded with sulfites — a chemical
used to preserve expensive oak barrels from rotting — and other substances,
which make them unsuitable for daily consumption in quantities
beyond an ounce or two.
I can‘t vouch for Chilean, Spanish,
Portuguese, or Australian table wines, because the controls
and standards in these countries may not be as strong as in France. Most
American table wines have added sulfites to preserve freshness,
and are better to avoid. There are some organic brands, but they are
more expensive than French table wines.
And,
incidentally, I don‘t believe that bottled blended table wines from
France or
anywhere else are close in nutrient density to home-made young wines from
recently harvested grapes.
So if you don‘t particularly care for
wines, don‘t drink them for the sake of your health — despite all those
numerous reports about the health benefits of wine, you aren‘t going to
gain much, unless you buy your wines from local
farmers by the jug. (I realize these are strong opinions, not
supported by research, but be serious — can you take seriously the
“research” paid for and promoted by the wine industry? If you do,
read that tale about the fox guarding the henhouse again.)
As time goes by, I‘ll be adding more essays and
analysis about all the major groups of food and related myths, just like I
did with fiber. Also I realize that you may not immediately grasp some of
these concepts because they fly in the face of what you‘ve been hearing
and doing for the last few decades. Here are a few suggestions:
Read this entire site before
addressing your own nutritional needs. You will have a much better
perspective on the role of nutrients and digestive mechanisms that
lurk behind this analysis.
You should really read
Fiber Menace. It explains all of these concepts in greater
length and depth than it‘s possible to do here.
Don‘t try to envision or
create a new menu from what you are reading. It‘s impossible. Simply
look at your current menu, take each single ingredient, and ask
yourself a simple question: Could my grand-grandma a hundred years
ago have procured this ingredient from her garden, pantry, or
grocer? If the answer is no, then you shouldn‘t eat it either?
Yes, what I am suggesting isn‘t leaving too many foods.
But, again, this site and my books aren‘t for people with abundant
health and stomachs made from iron, but for people with chronic
digestive disorders who are in their forties, fifties, and beyond. Past
middle age, it‘s always a trade-off between health and variety.
Finally, quality supplements (similar to these) are the
only reliable way to compensate for the shortcomings of urban living,
tap water, supermarket foods, and for prior damage. Besides, if you get
off fortified bread, pasta, cereals, milk, and juice, then you need to
replace these supplements with others, preferably of better quality.
Frequently Asked
Questions
Q. Are you on this kind of diet?
Yes, I practice what I preach. My nutrition is basic,
just like the one I just described. I eat only twice a day — a small
lunch in the afternoon, and a dinner in the late evening that by most
standards would look like a breakfast. Since I don‘t experience strong
hunger or cravings, it suits me just fine, and doesn‘t rob me of energy.
(When I overeat, I feel drugged out.) To avoid vitamin and mineral
deficiencies in my diet, I drink imported mineral water and take
the supplements described here.
And when I write, I work 12-14 uninterrupted hours on
that little food, and feel great and energetic. The only concession to
this crazy regimen — I work on the laptop semi-reclined in bed, on the
coach, or in the recliner to avoid stressing my spine from sitting in
the chair that long.
Even if I wanted any other diet, I can‘t have it,
because I stumbled into all this not seeking fortune, but out of
misfortune. Considering my brush with death a decade ago (in 1996) from
a vegetarian diet, I am in better shape today than most men my age — my
weight is normal, no medication, no chronic pain, normal bone density,
my hearing is as sharp as in my teens, my eyesight is only 10%-15% less
than when I was born, I still have all of my teeth, I no longer
have gum disease or new cavities, and there are no signs of
cardiovascular disease.
Another measure of “graceful aging” — my skin today is
about the same as a decade ago — no wrinkles, no age spots, no
discoloration, and no moles. And I can‘t say that I am not an outdoor
kind of person — I walked my two late dogs two to three times daily in
all kinds of weather from 1972 to 1990, never used sunblock, and never
hid from the sun (though I never intentionally sunbathed).
My only regret —not knowing all this before and missing
out on so many unbelievable opportunities that came my way so many
times. Still, it‘s a passing regret — for as long as I have my health,
opportunities will follow wherever I go.
Q. What mineral water do you drink?
We rotate imported mineral waters regularly from what‘s
available on the shelves at Whole Foods or similar specialty stores. Any
mineral water is okay — as long as you like the taste, it doesn‘t break
the bank, it lists mineral content on the label, is naturally
carbonated, and is sold in glass bottles.
If you go by these criteria, Perrier — one of the most
popular imported waters — doesn‘t qualify: it‘s artificially carbonated
([link],
see page 6), sold in plastic bottles, and doesn‘t list minerals on the
label.
Perrier does contain 155 mg of calcium and 5.9 mg of
magnesium per liter. To get your recommended daily calcium intake you‘ll
have to drink 7 glasses — and 65 for magnesium. So it isn‘t as bad as
tap water, but there are better choices. Just read the labels and you‘ll
find them.
Incidentally, don‘t construe this as if I am
anti-Perrier or something? No, I simply analyzed for you one of the
best-known and widely distributed brands, so you can apply similar
analysis to other, less known brands.
Then, there is bottled purified water like Dasani
(Coca-Cola Company) and Aquafina (PepsiCo.). Given a choice between
Perrier and Dasani [link]
or Aquafina, and based on this description on Dasani‘s web site, I‘d
rather drown in Perrier:

Translated from the ad-speak,
here is what it means: Coca-Cola's local bottlers buy municipal tap
water [local water supply] for around $2 for 1,000 gallons (enough to
make about 11,000 bottles at 12 oz each). They filter tap water via
reverse osmosis until its mineral content is near zero. Then, they add
trace amounts of magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, and table salt
[special blend of minerals] to associate Dasani with healthy “mineral”
water, so you‘ll think it's wholesome [link].
At the end of this production
cycle, the bottles from recycled plastic are the most expensive part of
Dasani‘s. Essentially, you are paying to drink the same water you are
flushing your toilet with, only purified, bottled, and premium-priced.
After all, a sucker drinks every day...
Incidentally, if you install a reverse osmosis filter
at home — a point of pride for so many — you are making your own Dasani.
I am all for removing chlorine and contaminants from tap water to wash
veggies, take showers, and boil eggs — but obviously, not for drinking.
Q. Why dietary fat is important for health and
longevity
People who don‘t consume adequate amounts of fat
regularly may develop the following disorders:
Constipation, because
dietary fat is a primary stimulant of the gastrocolic reflex.
Gallbladder disease,
because dietary fat is the sole stimulus for the release of bile. If bile
isn‘t regularly released from the gallbladder, bile salts may form
gallbladder stones.
Acute cholecystitis,
because unused bile salts or gallbladder stones may obstruct the hepatic (bile) ducts — the outlet tubes that connect the liver to the
gallbladder and duodenum [link].
Weight gain and obesity,
because dietary fat is a primary substance behind the control of
satiety, hunger, and appetite.
Enterocolitis (inflammatory
disease of the small and large intestine) because underutilized bile
causes inflammation of the intestinal mucosa and diarrhea.
All forms of bone and joint
diseases (tooth loss, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, rickets,
scoliosis, and osteomalacia, rheumatoid arthritis), because dietary
fat is essential for absorption of vitamin D, calcium, and magnesium
in the small intestine.
Rapid vitamin D deficiency
and all related disorders, because an absence of dietary fat prevents
the absorption of dietary vitamin D and reabsorption of the endogenous
vitamin D secreted with bile.
Heart disease and
hypertension, because vitamin D, calcium, and magnesium regulate
contraction and relaxation of smooth (blood vessels) and cardiac
(heart) muscles.
All kind of skeletal
muscular disorders, such as fibromialgia, for the same reasons as
above.
Blood disorders, because
dietary fat is essential for absorption of dietary vitamin K a
coagulation factor, and because essential fatty acids are required
in the “manufacture” of blood cells.
Impaired immunity, night
blindness, and skin disorders, because dietary fat is essential for
absorption of vitamin A.
A broad range of cognitive
dysfunctions, cardiovascular diseases, inflammatory disease,
infertility, amenorrhea, nerve damage, cancers, and other
conditions, related to acute deficiency of essential fatty acids.
Cellulite and other skin
disorders, related to overconsumption of vegetable fats to satisfy
cravings while avoiding animal fat.
Undesirable exposure to
unstable trans and rancid fats in all vegetable oils, which are
considered the primary triggers of inflammatory diseases (digestive,
cardiovascular, atherosclerosis, joints, asthma), and cancer.
Why, then, is Uncle Sam telling you not to consume
animal fats? It‘s simple — vegetable fat costs a penny a pound to
produce, while quality animal fat is much more expensive. Ages ago, the
agro-industrial oligopolies funded academic research to “prove” the
benefits of vegetable fats, lobbied the government, and spread enormous
amounts of disinformation through the trade groups. This has been going
since the beginning of the 20th century, with the advent of
margarine and related technologies to package and resell vegetable fats.
At one point everyone began to believe their own lies,
and they became the “truth.” This happening has two names — groupthink
and mass psychosis. The advent of vegetable fats and the disgrace of
animal fats very much parallels the advent of dietary fiber. And, just
like with fiber, its affects aren‘t immediately apparent, and take a
long time to develop. It‘s not really a conspiracy per se, but more like
a collective stupidity.
You won‘t find a reputable scientist or doctor
attacking these points, because all of the above is broadly taught in
every biology, physiology, and medical biochemistry class, and isn‘t a
subject of debate. Yes, some paid PR flacks from trade groups may shill
and shrill, but their opinion in this debate is just as relevant as
angry barks behind the fence, particularly in the Internet era.
What you‘ve just learned isn‘t an invitation to consume
unlimited fats, animal or vegetable alike, as Dr. Atkins once
recommended. Dietary fat digests almost completely and the excess is
deposited under the skin as fat for storage. The “excess” is the
difference between the fat used by the body for energy and plastic needs
(to make cells, hormones, etc.) and all digested fat.
Your energy needs vary, depending on your carbohydrate
consumption. The plastic needs are in the ballpark of 1 gram per 1 kg of
body weight. In other words, if you consume adequate amounts of carbs
and proteins, and weigh 70 kg, consuming about 100 g of fat will not
increase you weight. (The extra 30 grams are for losses from stools,
cellular uptake in the intestines, and inefficiency in digestion.)
The longevity diet (i.e. basic nutrition) is naturally moderate-to-low in fat, because natural meats, fowl, fish and seafood, and fermented dairy are relatively low in fat. In fact, most of the excess of fat consumption in the
American diet is coming from vegetable oils well hidden in fried foods, sauces, dressings, and mayonnaise. If you exclude all vegetable oils from your diet, you aren‘t likely to
consume excess animal fat, unless you do it consciously and
intentionally.
Also, note that sometimes I recommend an increase in
animal fat (butter) consumption because it‘s essential to overcome
digestive disorders and related conditions. Once you normalize your
situation, you can resume moderate fat consumption.
Finally, if you are overweight, then, with the
exception of essential fatty acids from liquid fish oil, you don‘t need
any additional fat. Your body will supply all the fat you need for
energy and plastic metabolism. This is, in fact, the most reliable
method of weight loss. Still, you need to consume moderate amounts of
fat to prevent hepatic and intestinal dysfunctions, listed in the bullet
points below.
Definitions
Endogenous — a
substance synthesized by the body, which is chemically identical to
the substance available from food. Between meals, for example, the
body can synthesize glucose from glycogen (glycogenolysis),
which is stored in the liver. After glycogen is exhausted, the body
converts amino acids (stored as muscle tissue) into glucose (gluconeogenesis).
Exogenous —
nutrition substances that come with food. Vitamin D, for example,
can be exogenous, when it‘s derived from cod liver oil or
supplements; or endogenous, when it‘s made in the specialized skin
receptors from the sun‘s UV-exposure.
In situ — literary,
made in place. When vitamin D is synthesized in the skin receptors
or vitamin K is synthesized by bacteria in the large intestine, it
means in situ. All in situ substances are, therefore,
endogenous.
Macronutrients —
carbohydrates, proteins, fat, and essential fatty acids.
Micronutrients — all
substances required by the body other than macronutrients (vitamins,
minerals, and trace elements).
Essential fatty acids
(EFA) — eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids,
available only from fish and seafood fat, such as cod liver oil,
fish oil, krill oil, etc. These fatty acids can‘t be made in
situ, and can come only from dietary sources.
Macro minerals (all
non-organic substances, body requires over 100 mg daily) include
Calcium, Chloride, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Sulfur.
Trace minerals
(microelements, daily requirement less than 100 mg) — Boron,
Chromium, Cobalt, Copper, Fluorine, Iodine, Iron, Manganese,
Molybdenum, Selenium, Zinc.
B-complex vitamins —
B1 (Thiamine) , B2 (Riboflavin) , B3 (Niacin), B5 (Pantothenic
acid), B6 (Pyridoxine), B7 (Biotin), B9 (Folic acid) and B12
(Cyanocobalamin).
Water-soluble vitamins
— all of the above plus vitamin C and Choline.
Fat-soluble vitamins
— vitamins A , D, E, and K; they digest only in the presence of
dietary fat in the intestines.
Raw [drinking] water —
ground water from dug or artesian wells and springs originating
from under the ground (not rainfall or ice cap), and not filtered, softened,
or aerated. Different from raw surface water (i.e. from rainfall,
rivers, lakes). Surface water doesn‘t contain as many minerals and
trace elements, and is usually contaminated by bacteria, plankton,
parasites, and pollutants. Most tap water is derived from surface
water. To make it suitable for drinking, it‘s filtered, ozonized or
treated by chemicals, such as chlorine, and aerated (oxygenated). In the context of this article,
by “raw water” I always mean ground water, not surface water. The
“spring” water sold in plastic bottles is processed for safety and
extended storage reasons at the source (i.e. spring) just like tap water, and isn‘t considered
raw water.
Mineral water — a
bottled water from underground sources with high mineral content
(contains at least 250 parts per million total dissolved solids).
The degree of processing varies depending on the brand. Some
“mineral” waters are reconstituted (i.e. mineral salts are mixed
with filtered tap water and carbonation added.) Can be naturally
carbonated or non-carbonated. Seltzer isn‘t a mineral water, but
artificially carbonated tap water. Reputable, high-quality mineral
waters are always bottled at the source into the glass bottles.
Plastic bottles can‘t withstand the pressure from natural
carbonation, and may contaminate the water through molecular
diffusion with potentially carcinogenic compounds.
Natural carbohydrates —
carbohydrates found in plants, such as fruits, vegetables,
legumes, beans, and grains. (The term may include fiber, because,
technically, fiber is a carbohydrate).
Processed carbohydrates
— table sugar, corn syrup, high fructose, and similar derivatives,
produced from plants. (The term may include fiber.)
Fortified food —
processed food with added synthetic supplements, which are mandated
by the government. The supplements added during fortification are
usually the lowest and least-expensive consumer grade, purchased in
bulk. China is one of the largest manufacturers of bulk supplements
in the world.
Organ meat — brain,
tongue, intestines, heart, kidney, liver, lungs, sweetbreads (thymus
or pancreas), and tripe (stomach) from grazing animals. In general,
when I say organ meat, I usually mean liver, because it has the
highest concentration of vitamins, minerals, and trace elements.
It‘s the most culturally acceptable food in the United States, and
generally available. In other countries with more evolved culinary
traditions, all other organs are widely used in cooking as well, but
they aren‘t as nutrient-dense as liver.
Fermented dairy —
naturally soured milk due to bacterial cultures. The resulting
soured milk has higher acidity and a slight alcohol level that
eliminates pathogens, extends storage, and makes it suitable for
drinking without boiling or pasteurization. Additional benefits are
absence of lactose, broken protein bonds, easy digestibility, and
better taste. Known by many names such as yogurt, kefir, buttermilk,
kumis, matsoni, etc., depending on the origin. Curded fermented milk
is used for cheese-making.
RDA — Recommended
Dietary Allowances. In use from 1991 to 1989. According to the Food
and Nutrition Board, RDA‘s “primary goal was to prevent diseases
caused by nutrient deficiencies. Technically speaking, the RDAs were
not intended to evaluate the diets of individuals, but they were
often used this way.” (More on differences between RDA and DRI here
[link]).
DRI — Dietary
Reference Intakes: Recommended intakes of micro- and macro-
nutrients for individuals, developed by the Food and Nutrition
Board, National Academy of Sciences. Institute of Medicine [link].
In use since 1997, replaced RDA, and established upper tolerable
intake levels (ULs) for selected micronutrients. DRI Tables [link].
|